Thought id clear up a little of the confussion and misunderstandings by bumpin
these obs up against the observers manual. These obs are correct for the
mostpart. I was not there, but diggin through some of the books, should be
accurate.
Aaron Kawczk
FNMOC
KADW 132055Z 20011KT 180V240 7SM FEW050TCU FEW100 SCT250 33/21 A2966
RMK TCU LOCATION/MOVEMENT SLP044 8/268 9/111 57022=
8/TcuAcCs-If it was towering cu, then it should have been noted after the sky
con and its location in the remarks section.
KADW 132155Z 15012KT 7SM FEW050 SCT250 31/23 A2963 RMK SLP034
8/408 9/202=
8/Sc0Cs-Actually, Sc (priority 4) has a higher priority than Tcu (priority 2),
if assuming the TCu is still there it should have been noted as above.
KADW 132255Z 16008KT 6SM HZ FEW050CB SCT100 BKN200 28/23 A2963 RMK
SLP036 CB DSNT W MOV E 8/963 9/223=
This ob is correct. The temp/dpt spread is large enough to call HZ.
KADW 132305Z 17007KT 6SM TS HZ FEW050CB SCT100 BKN200 28/23
A2962 RMK OCNL LTGIC TS 10 W MOV E
KADW 132355Z 25008KT 7 -TSRA FC SCT020CB BKN060 OVC100 21/20 RMK
FUNNEL CLOUD MOVD E PK WND 25099/35 FRQ LTGICCCCG TS 5 E MOV E GR 1/4 SLPNO
60064 8/96/ 9/53/ 5////
I myself am a bit confused here. The remarks discuss the funnel cloud as moving
off station, if so than there should have been a special ob beforehand when it
developed. Also a beginning and ending time should be noted in the remarks. Im
pretty sure the 25099/35 indicates a peak wind event, prob just forgot the
acronyms.
KADW 140059Z 27008KT 5SM -TSRA FEW005 SCT030 OVC040CB 18/17 A2978
RMK OCNL LTGICCCCG TS OHD MOV E SLPNO 8/9// 9/8// RCRNR
KADW 140155Z 31008KT 6SM -TSRA FEW005 SCT020 OVC040CB 17/16 A2983
RMK OCNL LTGICCCCG TS SE MOV E SLP096 8/9// 9/8// KC
KADW 140259Z 30005KT 7SM FEW030 BKN100 16/15 A2993
RMK TS MOV E SLP112 8/570 9/24
in reply to:
Hey Everyone --
This is weird. . . Navy/Marine Corps Special Criteria (SPECI's) indicate a
special observation is taken with your first 50kt gust associated with a
thunderstorm. I think that all Military Operations have the same special
criteria but now also observe the cloud groups associated with these
observations, I have reason to think that the observer wasnt paying much
attention in several instances. . .
2055 -- 8/268 -- Low 2, okay Towering Cumulus, could be a CB forming
2155 -- 8/408 -- Stratocumulus ?? If you have TCU it would be a greater
priority than the StratoCu not from Cu
2255 -- this one confuses me because what would make him call Haze with
such a close temp/dew point spread
2305 -- Okay, special for the TS
2355 -- FUNNEL CLOUD MOVD E 25099/35 What the heck kind of remark is this ?
I dont get it. . .Saying winds were 250{at}99kts {at} 2335 is the only thing that
comes to mind
0259 -- 8/570 -- StratoCu not from Cu? Is he losing his mind, now mind you,
I didnt see what he may or may not have seen but after a thunderstorm which
is from CumuloNimbus (CB) but thats what Low 5 is . . .
Keep in mind, Im not doubting what happened, just how it was reported. . ..
Im not in the Air Force, Im in Marine Corps weather. . .
===================================================
CASI StormReports Email List
TOO MUCH MAIL?
Set yourself to "Digest" to receive only ONE Email per day!
http://www.egroups.com/subscribe/stormreports
CASI StormReports Administration Addresses:
Post message: stormreports{at}onelist.com
UNSUBSCRIBE: stormreports-unsubscribe{at}onelist.com OR
http://www.egroups.com/subscribe/stormreports
ReSubscribe: stormreports-subscribe{at}onelist.com OR
http://www.egroups.com/subscribe/stormreports
List owner: stormreports-owner{at}onelist.com
TO CHANGE YOUR ADDRESS PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE THEN RESUBSCRIBE
Posting Suggestions URL:
http://www.weatherwatchers.org/members/casisr.html
===================================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 03 2000 - 11:06:25 EDT